You haven't yet saved any bookmarks. To bookmark a post, just click .

People in the dreaded "alt-right" often talk about becoming red pilled, and what they usually mean is that they watched a podcast with someone of authority like Stefan Molyneux discussing race realism. Race realism isn’t anything new. High quality analysis has been available for over 20 years regarding race and IQ and much more granular information is becoming available via DNA testing.

Dave Rubin and Stefan Molyneux discussing Race and IQ.

Our grandparents knew all about race, using the now passé method of analysis, known as stereotyping. Our historians knew about race by observing the rise and fall of civilizations. This should be news to no-one.

But yet, it is news, because our belief in racial equality has become something akin to a religion. In the place of Christianity, which lost much of its authority after the Second World War, we began to look for guidance from Hollywood and the media.

But Hollywood and the media were very far from being impartial teachers. Many key figures in both spheres of influence were Jewish with a natural interest in maintaining their ethnic safety in lands that were not their own. More importantly they were imbued with a religious tradition that favoured the idea of utopia on earth. A moshiach or King would, according to the Judaic tradition, eventually take dominion over the planet revealing the inherent spirituality of the material world.

It is this belief that forms the religious antecedent of communism that now informs our political and educational institutions. And so, most of us in the west were drip-fed moral propaganda directed towards creating a utopian socialist society; with no more rational basis than born again Christians waiting for the rapture.

We have too long overlooked the intellectual flaws inherent in communism, despite the 50th anniversary of Soviet tanks rolling through Prague occurring this summer. We failed to do the heavy intellectual lifting required to consider what would serve our own best interests. But why would we? Our hangover from Christianity forbids a healthy and interested survival instinct; and where Christianity didn’t dull our analytic abilities, engineered social conformity repressed them.

So it came as something of a surprise to many when after a campaign dripping with accusations of racism that a substantial majority of the British public voted for Brexit.

The media demonized Nigel Farage. Hitler was mentioned on multiple occasions and anyone with the slightest interest in reducing immigration was deemed a racist. Yet fully half the country voted out of the European Union anyway.

In a split second the illusion of moral consensus was broken. The media saw Goebbels in every bacon sandwich for a day or two till they were fully exhausted by their own paranoia, yet no serious crime by any sane member of the community was ever logged. The Met Police, following a Freedom of Information Act request revealed no link between Brexit and so-called hate-crime. Stocks fell during the frenzy then quickly recovered and not one of the predictions made by project fear materialized.

Of necessity the media machine stopped blackmailing the population over race issues -having found the majority unmoved- and quietly made the story an anodyne one of economics. The media have clearly lost their authority; yet so too had the Conservatives who bet the house on ‘Remain’ and demonized half their constituents.


With the herd turning and a propaganda machine shooting blanks The Conservative Party began using increasingly totalitarian methods to suppress the population.

Despite the fact that the police force is unable to deal with unheard of levels of crime, terrorism, and murder at rates approaching those of New York, the priority of the government has been to incarcerate and terrorize the native population for thought crime. Convicting Count Dankula for hate speech for his comedy video about a pug Hitler is simply dog-whistle repression. Banning a middle of the road civic nationalist like Lauren Southern and a traditionalist like Brittany Pettibone is yet another desperate move to push the Overton window back to a place where they can yet again override the native Brits natural instinct towards self preservation.

We are not and nor will we ever be at the end of history. Hobbes was right; the human animal is both an altruist and a predator. We all have the ability to reason and empathize to varying degrees, but our primitive instincts remain powerful.

Western civilizations have evolved, cognitively, to a point where we are acutely vulnerable to predation. You cannot empathize with your enemy and win in battle. A nation of atomized individuals adhering to abstract ideals will lose out every time against a tight knit racial-identitarian group, particularly one that is low in empathy. A population that trusts one another and is trustworthy will certainly thrive; but a population that trusts its enemies will perish.

The agenda of anti-racism is for native Brits to trust people not only in the absence of good information but even against our better judgement.
Our government has a duty of care to protect its people and yet in aid of a secular religion with no scientific, genetic or historical basis our people have been subjected to terrorism, violence, sexual predation and the abuse of our labor and financial systems.

Importing third world populations has not only given us third world problems, its has also increased our national debt which means outsiders have the power to direct our future and appropriate our labor intergenerationally.

A crippling national debt is an issue that has been with Britain since the Napoleonic wars. It is a product of our fiat based currency system, widespread acceptance of public debt, and usury. In a Christian country the hypocrisy of this fact is truly astonishing and it has lead to a series of governments that have not reflected the interests of British people.

Nobody today could argue that future generations will be more free than were their ancestors, nor are they safer and despite a technological inheritance with no historical rival, future generations will be less prosperous as well. With such grave consequences the anti-racist agenda must be seen for what it is, subversion of the most subtle and menacing nature; with the need for a remedy which reflects the seriousness of its consequences.

It cannot come too quickly for me.

by Lillian Bennet

Read more posts by this author.