You haven't yet saved any bookmarks. To bookmark a post, just click .

As I wrote in a previous piece for Republic Standard, the ultimate purge of the overt Philo-Semitism of the USSR did little to destroy the Bolshevist spirit. As a trans-national ideology propagated by a trans-national people, Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s “third epoch of the new times: Socialism” is Rasputin-esque in its difficulty to kill—but, to reference Predator, “If it bleeds, we can kill it!”

When I wrote that the Bolshevist spirit had slipped loose and headed Westward, its chief ideological foes, the “liberal democracies,” are now held in thrall to what is, in essence, the same modus operandi whereas in the Eastern Bloc they are not. It’s a little difficult to pinpoint the exact moment when the old order began to give way because it was not a flash-event like the October Revolution, but even as the Cold War raged, despite the system of communism in place in the USSR and its allies and proxies, it was the West whose psyche had been colonized. The defeat of communism, while a great victory, was not the defeat of Bolshevism. We can see it in action right now in the implementation of the Kalergi Plan and the preeminence of globalism, with power increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small cabal bent on GLOBAL DOMINATION. This cabal, erroneously depicted as the “white male patriarchy” has a similar skin pigmentation, but to quote Kalergi:

The main representatives of the corrupt, as well as the upright brain aristocracy: of capitalism, journalism and the literate, are Jews. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility. One look at the history of the Jewish people explains its lead in the struggle over the governance of humanity.

As the Jewish World itself declared: “Fundamentally Judaism is anti-Christian.” So, too, would be the Religion of Peace, whose adherents form the vanguard of the Hijrah to subjugate Christian Europe (or once-Christian Western Europe, more accurately) and its Western cousins. Both Jew and Moslem will, of course, look favorably upon the weakening of Christendom, for its ultimate colonization is each’s aim. The egalitarians, possessed with a similar hatred for the West, will join them advocating for the importation of as many alien peoples as possible, to drown the native populations in groups that simply do not share the same values and thus have no vested interest in protecting them. This is not uniformly true of non-whites, of course, but in poll after poll, example after example, a majority have proven to default to the strongman, the Oriental despot, the emir, or some variant. Liberal democracies or the American system of checks-and-balances and Enlightenment republicanism are of no interest to the average Pakistani or Gambian or Honduran.


Nor is an eight-hundred-year tradition of common law as in the United Kingdom, where the mess of competing ideologies—all trafficking in open borders—are beginning to slam headlong into each other with greater and greater force. Labour appears to be backing the Islamic horse, as our old friend Labour MP Naz Shah posted on Facebook that she had a ‘solution’ to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict:

"Relocate Israel into the United States…transportation costs will be less than three years of defense spending... problem solved."

And don’t forget about Jeremy Corbyn. Quoting Theodore Dalrymple:

In all the commentary about Corbyn’s anti-Semitism, real or feigned, no one seems to have noticed that anti-Semitism is perfectly logical for someone of Corbyn’s cast of mind. It has often been said that anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools; it would be more accurate to say that socialism is the anti-Semitism of intellectuals (at least in modern conditions). Anti-Semitism and socialism proceed along the same lines, using the same kind of presuppositions and evidence…No one can say for certain whether Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s anti-Semitism is a sincerely held prejudice or merely a matter of electoral calculation… But either way, his failure to condemn anti-Semitism in his own party, his penchant for consorting in friendly fashion with extremist anti-Zionists of genocidal instincts, and his defense of a mural depicting lupine Jewish bankers playing Monopoly on the backs of naked minorities are cause for anxiety among British Jews.

As I wrote in that earlier piece for Republic Standard, Judaism and Bolshevism, from Marx on down, are inextricably intertwined; Dalrymple makes the point that Corbyn’s brand of Leftism is inherently anti-Jewish, reminiscent of Larry David commissioning a symphony to serenade his Gentile wife with Wagner or something. As we saw with Barack Obama’s regime, espousing Leftist ideology doesn’t mean one has to kowtow to The Tribe. Obama (probably a Moslem) was aggressive in his efforts to minimize the reach of Israel. Yet his policies remained tethered to the socialism of Jewish origin. Similarly, Joseph Stalin, himself one-quarter Jewish, retained the system, more or less, that was responsible for so many atrocities against the Soviet population, including the Holodomor—itself twice as deadly as the high-death mark for the Holocaust (12 million versus 6 million).

Borrowing from Vicomte Leon De Poncins, with the rise of the Bolshevik regime:

The inward thought of Moscow (the Jews) indeed appears to be that for twenty centuries while humanity has been following Christ, it has been on the wrong word. It is now high time to correct this error of direction by creating a new moral code, a new civilization, founded on quite different principles (Talmudic Principles).

As W.E. Curtis wrote;

“The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund.”

Half of the members of Lenin’s conference before the October Revolution were Jews, and four of the seven original members of the Politburo were Jews. The Jews were dramatically overrepresented in positions of intelligence gathering, senior roles in the Soviet, interrogators, and many other arms of the state. What’s more, roughly three-quarters of the Cheka were Jewish, and reports inform us that they were very careful to spare their brethren. Borrowing this vital calculation from

If at the times of the Red Terror members of an ethnic group representing 80% of the population (Russians) were responsible for 30% of the terror, and in turn members of a group representing 1.8% of the population (Jews) were responsible for almost 40% of the Terror, then the following relation results:

÷ = 22.2 ÷ 0.375 = 59.26

This means that statistically, the Jews of the Soviet Union bear 59 times as much responsibility for the Red Terror per capita than the Russian population.

The Dutch ambassador to Russia, in 1918, wrote:

Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.

Not to continue to paw through the bones of the two World Wars, but it’s vital we understand that the lessons learned have been all the wrong ones. The past century has represented the fallout from Europe’s attempted suicide in the form of World War I.

Millions of brave young men died for nothing, and the same dreadful march to oblivion was repeated just over two decades later. The peace has been kept since 1945, insofar as peace can be kept, by the United States effectively bankrolling the entire Western world’s defense budget, and that’s largely masked the fragility of our allies. The West bequeathed to the victors’ progeny is run by delusional and opportunistic globalists and frauds, intent, finally, on replacing the entire native European population as penance for all past misdeeds both real (yet exaggerated) and imagined.

The reverberations of World War II especially are still with us; so terrifying is the specter of Nazism, we are commanded to fear nationalism in even the most benign of manifestations—with one glaring exception. In our zeal to never allow the “selectively-remembered” atrocities of that particular war to happen again, we’ve seen vilified all Eurowestern national pride as the first step toward inevitable genocide. Given the prevalence of Cult-Marx post-modernism and deconstructionism in the academy, it’s little surprise the soil for this kind of thinking has proven so fertile. There’s more to it, certainly, but the intellectual groundwork had already been laid for the profoundly corrupting influence of this serpentine, shape-shifting Bolshevism, never allowing itself to be restricted by the borders of the nation-state. Mark Weber writes:

"As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment. Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that “because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel.”

Ideologically, there is no day-light between communism and Judaism, and not just because of the Jewish genesis of communism; as appeared in the Jewish World on February 9th, 1933:

“The great ideal of Judaism is that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations—a greater Judaism in fact—all the separate races and religions shall disappear.”

This Brotherhood with no religion and “nothing to kill and die for” reminds me of both Lennon and Lenin, but Judaism, which is largely atheistic at this point anyway, would be the sole driver of the international super-state, so I guess it wouldn’t be all races and religions, just those that are outside Ashkenazim. As Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi explicitly stated:

The man of the future will be a mongrel…The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future… will replace the diversity of peoples…Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose, where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats governs the country…The prominent position held by the Jews these days is owed to their spiritual supremacy…Strength of character paired with sharpness of the mind predestinates the Jews in their most excellent specimen to become the leaders of urbane humanity.

The reason they are so insistent on erasing distinct races and nations is because these are obstacles to the globalist project. The methods and the end-game, just like communism, are the same. As Winston Churchill wrote in 1920, Bolshevism is:

[A] worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.

He continued:

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power come from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek—all Jews. In the Soviet institutions, the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

Leftists and socialists can balk and shout all they want that wealth redistribution and central planning are necessary to furthering equality, but there is absolutely nothing in recorded history that would suggest the stated utopian aims would not be be-deviled by basic human instincts, and this is accepting their claims at face value before considering that there might be ulterior motives, which frankly we know there are. The genealogy of Marxism, including the present Cultural Marxist paradigm, is but one vehicle to exert power and control. It does not, however, need to stay confined to that one particular ideology. Take it away, Vladimir Jabotinsky:

[We have] the power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.

Where had I heard something like this before? Ah yes, Israeli journalist Arieh Shavit:

We believe with absolute certitude right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands, and the New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own.

That’s not a very egalitarian outlook—I thought it was virtually criminal for people to pursue the interests and advancement of their own people? The good news for the globalist-minded Jews is that, by playing multiple “games,” they, of course, enhance their chances of winning, but there is also a greater chance of blow-back or of there being unintended consequences.

In the interests of eliminating Christendom’s ability to resist its own colonization and eventual erasure, the importation of millions of Moslems, who are dead-set on subjugating if not destroying both of their long-standing Abrahamic enemies as foot-soldiers, is vital. It’s a significant gamble, however, and anti-Semitic attacks are spiking across Europe. The Moslems have their own designs, and they do not include domination by the Jews. What we have here are several competing ideologies (and we shouldn’t forget the “Chamber of Commerce” hyper-capitalists as another key player) with significant overlap, each trying to use each other, or at least take advantage of the opportunities the others create, and what’s resulted is that they’ve created a winner-take-all set of conditions with the future of the West entirely up for grabs.

Which horse will you back? I shall give you a little “insider baseball” on who I’m “with” (and it’s not Her): Let us not forget our history. A conquering army will always be felled by a people defending their home, no matter how crudely-outfitted and ramshackle because they are fighting for the very survival of all they hold dear. Alexander the Great, the USSR, the United States—none could bring the mighty Pashtun warrior to heel for this very reason.

The entire world is aligned against us, and yet we still have a puncher’s chance. Good thing I like to fight.


John Q. Publius

by John Q. Publius

John Q. Publius writes for Republic Standard and runs the blog The Anatomically Correct Banana.