“You don’t have to be crazy to
work live here, but it helps!”
The globalist establishment is continuing to intensify its gaslighting operation in the service of furthering their project of total Western population replacement through mass Third World immigration and White dispossession. Gaslighting is defined as, “a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity… It is a common technique of abusers, dictators, narcissists, and cult leaders.” Surely any objections to the globalists’ demographic warfare are nothing but conspiracy and madness. It’s not that by every metric from social harmony to safety to education quality of life declines as diversity increases, or that horrific and rare diseases are “suddenly and inexplicably” cropping up throughout the West. These objections are pathologies, the products of weird and defective minds, deranged expressions of “racism”—a completely irrational impulse with nothing whatsoever to do with pattern recognition, perception, or first-hand experience. As Ricardo Duchesne writes:
Negative effects on Whites count as evidence that Whites are not accepting diversity and that they need more education on the merits of diversity and the perils of racism….Research keeps showing a negative relationship between diversity and trust/social capital, but the problem is that nationals are not giving enough welfare handouts to immigrants. Moreover, if the respondents are White, that is because they have not yet learned how to live in a diverse society. Conversely, if the respondents are not Whites, that is because Whites are not doing enough to integrate them… The problem lies with Whites; visible minorities are superior in their ability to live with diversity; we need to replace archaic Whites stuck with images of mechanical associations; immigrants are more sophisticated, they are adapting to diverse organic communities which are the wave of the future.
You see, mass population movements are perfectly natural and in no way shape or form designed. Israel’s Yinon Plan has nothing to do with the convulsions in the Middle East. “Coincidentally,” just as the German people had begun to push back against Angela Merkel’s suicidal immigration/asylum policy with demonstrations in Chemnitz and elsewhere, seven men allegedly linked to “Revolution Chemnitz” were arrested on charges of a “far-right anti-immigrant terrorist plot.” They are being described as “Neo-Nazi” by authorities. Contrast this with the initial silence of the media regarding the racial attacks by Somali gangs at an amusement park in Minnesota, which is now being retconned into a conspiracy theory by the press. Seriously, look at this headline and tell me there isn’t an agenda: “Alt-Right ‘Journalist’ Claims ‘Somali Mobs’ Shut Down Valleyfair; Shakopee PD Disagrees.” Just whacky right-wing conspiracy stuff people—you’d have to be nuts to believe it! Besides, the press has never lied to obscure the true nature of Bolshevism and the government has never been involved in psyops or any human rights abuses of this nature. Our culture has indeed been pathologized after being marinated in Cultural Marxism for decades, but it is certainly not the resistance to unassimilable and hostile aliens that is the pathology. As Duchesne writes:
What we have seen in Sweden, Germany, Italy, Britain, France, Ireland are injections of unskilled immigrants costing billions of dollars in welfare expenses, continuous terrorist acts by Muslims, and persistent incidents of sexual assaults and gang rape against White women…In any case, we know that Japan and South Korea, and every other non-Western nation facing an aging population, are finding better solutions, such as automation, late retirement, and policies encouraging families to have more children.
These perfectly reasonable objections to what’s before the ellipsis and these perfectly reasonable and practical solutions to an aging population after it instead of the wholesale importation of dysfunctional and backward societies are instead not the product of sober and sane minds but of regressive fossils and fringe fanatics. The “insanity” tactic is tried-and-true Bolshevist practice. British foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt was recently lambasted for comparing the European Union to the Soviet Union, and the Independent, while reporting on Mr. Hunt’s comments, specifically cited the Soviet practice of imprisoning dissidents in psychiatric hospitals as one primary reason the European Union is nothing at all like the former USSR. Oh?
In the 1990s, in the Netherlands, the Ministry of Defense tried to silence a social worker by falsifying several psychiatric diagnoses. We have witnessed the advent of “information disorders” in order to frame “belief” in “fake news” as a psychiatric condition. In France, not only was Marine Le Pen charged by authorities for posting images of ISIS atrocities on Twitter but was ordered by a court to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. Let us also not forget that Knut Hamsun was confined to a mental hospital after World War II for supporting Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. Hamsun’s confinement obviously precedes the formation of the European Union, but the point here is that it’s not as if the forces of “liberalism” have never resorted to such tactics to quash opposition to their globalist project.
Today, “Holocaust Denial” laws may be the ultimate form of gaslighting. Not only is it insane to question the insane figure of six million, but it is also literally criminal. Powerful Jewish interests were instrumental in the enshrinement of these “Holocaust Denial” laws in seventeen countries, and the Jewish connection with psycho-pathological pseudo-science is also well-documented. At times, they even intersect. George Lincoln Rockwell’s men were assaulted by a mob on the National Mall in 1960 and were themselves arrested rather than the assaulters (sound familiar?); Rockwell was court-ordered to a psychiatric hospital at his trial. In a scenario which has subsequently been replayed with many prominent figures on the Left including a number of psychologists publicly stating that President Trump should be deemed “mentally unfit for office” and impeached despite there being absolutely no evidence that he is in any way mentally ill (other than perhaps a little OCD), the 1964 edition of Fact magazine Volume I, Issue 5 featured “1,189 Psychiatrists say Goldwater is Psychologically Unfit to be President!” Edited and published by Ralph Ginzburg who is, unsurprisingly, Jewish, the old “anti-Semitic” accusation was bandied about rather recklessly in addition to (or perhaps as evidence of) presidential candidate Barry Goldwater’s supposed psychological unfitness:
Ginzburg…states that Senator Goldwater "does not identify with the Jewish part of his heritage," and is ashamed of the fact he is Jewish. It also insinuates on pages 5 and 6 of Fact that the Senator is anti-Semitic.
One of the contributing authors and editors, Warren Boroson, wondered if anti-Semitism is a disease. It’s certainly contagious when people finally come to grips with the depths of Jewish depravity and duplicitousness. In June 2015, Jewish Judge Richard Berman ordered Dinesh D’Souza to undergo further psychiatric counseling as part of his post-confinement punishment for a single illegal campaign contribution, overruling the judgment of two licensed psychological counselors in the U.S. probation department who declared D’Souza perfectly normal. Former New York police officer Adrian Schoolcraft was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric ward after he turned whistleblower for having been coerced into falsifying crime statistics. The state of California has the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act which allows for a law enforcement official or “psychological professional” (not even necessarily a licensed clinical psychologist) to render a determination of an individual’s mental health and have that individual involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital. Florida’s Baker Act also allows for involuntary institutionalization if an individual may be suspected of suffering from a mental illness—with mental illness in this case as defined by the Act itself.
There are three salient points here: one, as in the USSR, the state has weaponized “mental health” as a means of punishing and silencing dissidents; two, the media-entertainment-academia complex, by its very construction, routinely gaslights people into genuine psychopathy; and three, as in other arenas specifically geared toward first eroding and ultimately destroying the West’s confidence, sense of itself, and, indeed, will to live, Jews are responsible for some of the most corrosive and vitriolic anti-Western and anti-White concepts with which we are currently reckoning.
The ADL’s Abraham Foxman cried out in pain while his co-ethno-religionist Dr. Stewart David Nozette struck us by receiving payments from Israel for US aerospace technology secrets and was consequently sentenced to just 13 years in prison by saying:
What I find troubling and perplexing is that our government seems only interested in investigating people who’re connected with Israel. It plays into the hands of those who say Jews or those connected to Israel are disloyal.
That is very clearly not the case as the late Senator Joseph McCarthy could’ve told you, but Foxman’s rhetoric here is instructive. That would be the same Foxman who stated that the ADL’s mission is to “make America as user-friendly to Jews as possible.” Since Israeli espionage in the mid-1980s, the nation has benefitted enormously from a trade imbalance with the United States to the tune of around $10 billion annually in addition to direct aid and the “charitable” exemptions funneled into the country by co-ethno-religionists. We “can’t” have a wall but we can somehow find $38 billion for Israel in the budget; that’s a little…curious shall we say. According to the Atlantic’s 2009 list of the top fifty most influential pundits, to quote Steve Sailer:
The 1% of the population that is White, male and Jewish, like Matty Iglesias and Ezra Klein, made up 43% of the most influential pundits, what civil rights lawyers call Disparate Impact.
Taken individually, any one of these pieces of evidence is disturbing though may appear aberrant. It is when we zoom out and begin to connect the dots and to recognize a pattern of behavior, a modus operandi if you like, that things start to get really disturbing. The Civil Rights Movement was in no small part the weaponization of Blacks by Jews against the White majority. Dontell Jackson informs:
Behind every single Black rights organization the Jews have been there from the very beginning pulling the strings, from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR), the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordination Committee (SNCC)…During the Civil Rights Movement, Jewish activists represented a disproportionate number of “Whites” involved in the struggle. Jews made up half of the young people who participated in the Mississippi Freedom Summer in 1964. Leaders of the Reform Movement were arrested with Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in St. Augustine, Florida, in 1964 after a challenge to racial segregation in public accommodations. Most famously, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel marched arm-in-arm with Dr. King in his 1965 March on Selma. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were drafted in the conference room of Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, under the aegis of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, which for decades was located in the Center. The Jewish community has continued to press for government legislation to undermine traditional American culture and wholesome family values through their support of affirmative action giving preferential treatment to not only Blacks but also gays and lesbians.
Jewish intellectuals, writers, activists, pundits, and other public figures have taken on an outsized role in pathologizing and damaging natural in-group preferences for Whites, obscuring and manipulating cognitive and racial differences, and generally contributing to the “de-construction” of all aspects of the Historic American Nation, from its demographics to its values; this number includes, but is certainly not limited to, individuals such as Noel Ignatiev, Otto Kleinberg, Oscar Handlin, Noam Chomsky, Horace Kallen, Howard Zinn, Allen Ginsburg, Harvey Milk, Max Warburg, Ben Wattenburg, Emma Lazarus, Joel and Arthur Spingarn, George Soros, Julius Rosenwald, Bret Stephens, Saul Alinsky, Gloria Allred, Naomi Wolf, Andrea Dworkin, Leslie Feinberg, Emanuel Celler, David Petegorsky, David Axelrod, Natan Sharansky, Jennifer Rubin, Richard Lewontin, Philip Roth, most of the neocons like the Kristol’s and Jonah Goldberg, Gloria Steinem (half), Naomi Jaffe, Susan Sontag, Franz Boas, basically everyone from the Frankfurt School, the “New York Intellectuals,” Henry Kissinger, and Henry Moskowitz; Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Stephen Breyer; a number of “money men” who operate behind the scenes in Hollywood, the media (including social media), and the publishing industry; and, perhaps most importantly, the hugely disproportionate Jewish influence in the financial sector.
Interesting, then, that Paul Krugman, a man whose co-ethno-religionists are obscenely overrepresented in the Ivy League even when you adjust for expected outcomes regarding IQ and when you control for merit, who are one-third of the Supreme Court but just 1.5% of the population, who only comprise 0.3% of the US armed forces but are overrepresented in the Senate and House by multiples, whose households are twice as likely as the US average to have an income over $75,000, who are also 17 times more likely to be a billionaire, and who, despite being less than 0.2% of the global population, are 11.6% of its billionaires, should deign to lecture Whites on privilege in his recent New York Times op-ed. Krugman states that “hatred can go along with high income, and all too often does,” but is very clearly not aware of the irony in his statement. You see, the ethnic state of Israel ascribes to a supremacist ideology regarding its enshrinement of Apartheid, sterilizes Ethiopian Jews in the interest of eugenics (oh, you thought eugenics was just a “Nazi thing”?), and, unlike Russia, actively interferes in American elections. A number of leading Jews have openly professed their support for the degradation and extermination of the unique peoples of Europe. As Jewish author Israel Cohen wrote in his A Racial Program for the 20th Century (1912):
We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.
Krugman ascribes “racial resentment” as “what distinguished Trump voters.” Resentment for being vilified as the sole source of evil in this world certainly, but racial resentment? Didn’t Trump win most of the disputed counties that previously went to Barack Obama? Furthermore, racial resentment doesn’t seem to be billowing forth like so much noxious gas from White intellectuals, but rather the Jewish ones like Krugman, who self-congratulatorily preens “I’ve spent my whole adult life in rarefied academic circles, where everyone has a good income and excellent working conditions.” The following sentiments by these Jewish intellectuals are representative: Judy Finkel’s work explores, “White racial identity as a barrier to understanding diversity” and Frank Furedi believes that “Whiteness is a nonsense category,” while Jennifer Roth-Gordon addresses “racial malleability” and “the centrality of Whiteness” and “conservative” Bill Kristol once proposed we replace the White working class with cheap mestizo labor. Warren J. Blumenfeld made some crucial scholarly contributions to our understanding of “Christian privilege” and published several indispensable texts on diversity, social justice, and “cissexism.” Magnus Herschfeld is responsible for the conception of the ideological weapon known as the word “racism.” Jewish Harvard Magazine contributor and author Dr. Noel Ignatiev makes the case that we must “abolish Whiteness” and that “treason to Whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” And who can forget the immortal words of Susan Sontag: “The White race is the cancer of human history.”